Why Miers won't drift left
In my opinion on of the best ways to judge whether a Justice may "drift" after being appointed is the examine their lifestyle. The older people get, the less apt they are to change. If Miers were to go left on the Court, that would mean abandoning the circles of friends and church that are the mainstay of her life. In contrast, Justice Souter was a loner:
Souter's lifestyle and personal interests predicted his liberalism. Souter came to Washington with no "circle of friends." Obviously, his new friends were all liberals...as the New York Times reported:
Perhaps Miers and Ginsburg can share.....um nothing. How about Miers and Breyer, maybe they will hit it off. They can talk about the old days at Harvard? Maybe Souter can chat with Miers about what its like to be single... Get real; Miers is from Texas. All of the other Justices despise Texas. It's obvious Miers has nothing in common with any of the sitting liberal Justices (if any of the Justices).
His penchant for solitude and his seemingly narrow circle of close friends convinced some that the middle-aged bachelor was out of touch with the sort of "real world" problems the nation's highest court regularly confronts.
Souter's lifestyle and personal interests predicted his liberalism. Souter came to Washington with no "circle of friends." Obviously, his new friends were all liberals...as the New York Times reported:
Of the justices on the current court, the one who forged the closest bond with Justice Blackmun was Justice David H. Souter. From their affectionate correspondence, the two Harvard College and Harvard Law School graduates appear to have been kindred souls. Not only were both meticulous, they also shared a love of the northern landscape.
In early 1994, they shared a lunch-hour expedition to the Freer Gallery of Art. Their frequent lunch dates usually meant that Justice Souter would bring a container of yogurt to Justice Blackmun's chambers. Over the summers, he sent Justice Blackmun postcards from the New Hampshire mountains. One year he sent something else: a commercial photograph of two fishermen, one in an inflatable rowboat and the other in hip boots, casting a line. "Row vs. Wade: The Great Western Fishing Controversy," the caption read. "For your collection," Justice Souter wrote.
Perhaps Miers and Ginsburg can share.....um nothing. How about Miers and Breyer, maybe they will hit it off. They can talk about the old days at Harvard? Maybe Souter can chat with Miers about what its like to be single... Get real; Miers is from Texas. All of the other Justices despise Texas. It's obvious Miers has nothing in common with any of the sitting liberal Justices (if any of the Justices).
John Fund of the Wall Street Journal changed his mind on the Miers nomination after digging into the nominee's early history (http://www.opinionjournal.com/diary/?id=110007384). Perhaps there is hope that Sloanasaurus could do the same. John Fund's piece is one that every JAS Member should read.
I read it. Like Fund, I also agree that Miers name should be withdrawn. I am just arguing that she won't be Justice Souter. However, I think there are 20 better picks than her.
According to George Will, there are 10,000 picks better than her. He neglects that there will be heavy intersection among 100 lists each of 100, and that the number would be closer to 1 - 2 thousand. But, yes, there are at least 1000 picks better than Miers.
Post a Comment