Red vs. Blue science?
This article is a classic example of the liberal media implying that conservatives are idiots:
I wasn't aware that scientific evidence of evolution was opposed by thousands of scientists around the globe, whereas the humans causing global warming theory is widely discredited.
The article is really about stem cells. The liberal author argues that conservativesare dumb to oppose stem cell research because wouldn't it be great to be able to grow body parts.
Killing another human to grow body parts is bad enough... but she conveniently left off the bit about having to clone the embryo to get your own body parts.... They always leave off the bit about cloning.
By now you may be forgiven for suspecting that science is tinted — if not entirely tainted — by politics. The arguments over evolution and global warming alone are enough to make anyone believe that we have red and blue science as well as red and blue states.
I wasn't aware that scientific evidence of evolution was opposed by thousands of scientists around the globe, whereas the humans causing global warming theory is widely discredited.
The article is really about stem cells. The liberal author argues that conservativesare dumb to oppose stem cell research because wouldn't it be great to be able to grow body parts.
Killing another human to grow body parts is bad enough... but she conveniently left off the bit about having to clone the embryo to get your own body parts.... They always leave off the bit about cloning.
Post a Comment